Sakeliga v Ouditeur-Generaal van Suid-Afrika
Sakeliga v Auditor-General of South Africa
Te midde van landswye munisipale verval, weier die Ouditeur-Generaal van Suid-Afrika om bestuursverslae bekend te maak wat na afhandeling van die staatsouditeur se jaarlikse oudit, aan die onderskeie munisipaliteite se bestuurspanne voorgelê word. Die gebrek aan deursigtigheid bring mee dat die publiek en sakekamers se vermoë om ingrepe by hul munisipaliteite te doen, beperk is.
Sakeliga litigeer teen die Ouditeur-Generaal sodat die bestuursverslae van 154 probleem-munisipaliteite landswyd waar daar ernstige probleme met dienslewering en finansiële administrasie is, bekend gemaak word. Sakeliga wil hierdie verslae ontleed ten einde sakekamers en ander georganiseerde besigheid te bemagtig met langtermyn-strategieë vir sake-selfstandigheid te midde van munisipale ineenstorting.
In the midst of countrywide municipal decay, the Auditor-General of South Africa refuses to disclose management reports that are submitted to the management teams of the various municipalities following completion of the state auditor’s annual audit. This lack of transparency results in only limited ability of the public and business chambers to intervene in their municipalities.
Sakeliga has launched litigation against the Auditor-General with a view to disclosing the management reports of 154 problem municipalities all over the country where there are serious problems regarding service delivery and financial administration. Sakeliga wishes to analyse these reports in order to empower business chambers and other organised business with long-term strategies for business self-reliance in the midst of municipal collapse.